You are viewing inverarity

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Alexandra
Chapter 27 — Broken Circle.



This was the start of the post-climax, and also the start of my habit of drawing out denouements for several chapters. Alexandra is healing up in the infirmary, and her first visitor is Ms. Shirtliffe, whom Alexandra sees for the first time in her Witch-Colonel's uniform.


“You were given an unfair disadvantage from the moment you arrived here,” Ms. Shirtliffe said. “You were brought to Charmbridge Academy without even the minimal preparation most Muggle-born students receive, and set up to do poorly on your SPAWNs. Ms. Grimm didn't want you to immediately excel, and was hoping that being held back would make you a little less remarkable. I knew the moment I met you that you have too much talent to suppress, though. You're definitely your father's daughter.”

“So you knew who my father was all along?” Alexandra asked quietly.


Ms. Shirtliffe has always been one of the few teachers Alexandra respects, although like most people she respects, their relationship is a contentious one. But although she doesn't absorb it immediately, this is yet another scene that erodes Alexandra's trust of adults. While Ms. Shirtliffe didn't really agree with Dean Grimm's plan, she went along with it, so once again, Alexandra realizes that an adult she kind of looked up to has been lying to her.

Then Ms. Shirtliffe tries to talk her into joining the JROC. We know how that turns out in book two.

Then her friends come to visit.


“So,” David said, “I hear your father really was a bad-ass Dark wizard after all.”

There was a shocked silence. David was looking at her seriously. Constance and Forbearance had both turned bright red, and Forbearance was giving David a scathing look, which he ignored.

Alexandra stared back at him, and then snorted. “Yeah,” she said. “I guess that makes me bad –”

“Alex!” squeaked Anna, and David's face broke out into a grin. Darla and Angelique laughed nervously, and Constance and Forbearance looked relieved.

“So it's true,” Darla said quietly.

“Are you going to be afraid of me now?” Alexandra asked, and though she was looking at Darla, she was really watching Anna, out of the corner of her eye.

“She's already afraid of you,” Angelique smirked, and Darla protested, “I am not!”


Okay, those dialog tags are awful. Anna "squeaks," and you can't smirk dialog. But there is quite a bit going on here, particularly with... D-D-D-Darla. Whose ultimate fate I had not at this point worked out yet, but who I knew was going to become more than just Alexandra's snotty rich-girl frenemy in book two.


“I'm not Dark,” Alexandra said.

“'Course not,” said Constance.

“I'm not going to turn Dark just because of my father. I don't want people to be afraid of me.”

“I think you like being feared some,” said Forbearance.


Yes, yes she does.

Alexandra and Anna's tearful parting is interrupted by Dean Grimm. And Alexandra and Dean Grimm have it out. Except not really, because Aunt Lilith is still keeping most of the truth hidden from Alexandra. But Alexandra is not quick to let go of the fact that Dean Grimm lied to her earlier, and didn't seem to take the threats to her life seriously. Rereading this now, Ms. Grimm really does seem, if not incompetent, well, really, really bad at handling Alex. Which I intended, but perhaps not to this degree.

Dean Grimm gives Alexandra an explanation for the Thorn Circle. Mr. Journey's attempts to kill her, and the significance of being the Thorn Circle's Secret-Keeper. And she reveals the final twist: the true nature of the Circle of Protection.

Alexandra fell silent. Ms. Grimm continued. “Journey did surmise, correctly, that he couldn't strike you down directly. Making someone impervious to harm is extremely difficult. True invulnerability is like invisibility or immortality – highly sought after and virtually unattainable, even with magic. A lethal blow, a killing curse, it has to be borne by someone if not the recipient. Your father's charm couldn't make you invulnerable, but it could cause someone else to be murdered in your stead.” She smiled grimly. “Only Mr. Journey thought that by breaking your gold circlet, he had bypassed that protection. He broke the wrong circle.”

Alexandra's mouth fell open as she understood. “Oh,” she said. “The Circle...”

“Such a spell is not without precedent,” said Ms. Grimm. “But it's very difficult, very powerful, not found in any book. And I should think your father would have needed the permission of those whose lives were bound to yours. Perhaps they thought it was only fair, as your life was protecting them in return. I am only speculating. But Journey was a fool. He should have understood better the circle he was a part of.” She shook her head. “With his death, the Circle is broken, I think, at least as far as your protection goes. No one else is likely to die in your place, Alexandra.”


I gather this, like the Fidelius Charm plot device, wasn't entirely clear to all readers. Abraham Thorn, at the same time that he cast the Fidelius Charm, also created a life-bond between the entire Thorn Circle and Alexandra. It was a sort of one-time "Get out of death free" card — in which some member of the Circle would suffer the fate intended for her. In this case, it was Ben Journey. Was it because he happened to be closest, or because he was responsible for trying to kill her, or did the Circle of Protection act with a sort of mystical sentience, or was it merely coincidence?

Then she gives Alexandra a speech which Alexandra is, unfortunately, still not mature enough to assimilate.

“You are, I think, more like your father than you know. No, listen to me, child!” she added, as Alexandra was about to interrupt her. “What we know about Abraham Thorn is that he is egotistical, arrogant, willing to protect those close to him, but also willing to use them. Let me tell you what makes him such a terrible threat, what makes the Governor-General fear him. It's not that he is a powerful wizard – though he is. And it's not that his ideas and his ambitions are dangerous – though they are. It's that he is so very, very charismatic! How did he gather such a loyal following in the first place? People willing to face impossible odds and extraordinary threats on his behalf? A circle of followers willing to die for him – or for his daughter.”

She held Alexandra's gaze. “You have that same gift, Alexandra. Your friends are remarkably loyal to you. You haven't even begun to exercise your powers of persuasion, but it's clear you can talk them into putting themselves at great risk on your behalf. Miss Chu – well, I don't need to tell you what price she might have paid for her loyalty to you. Think on that. The difference between you and your father is in how you choose to use your gifts... and your friends.”


While Alexandra is still lacking in maturity and self-awareness, she's not lacking in perceptiveness (especially when it lends itself to pushing back against authority figures):

Alexandra thought a moment, and slowly shook her head. “My father never claimed me,” she said, with sudden resolution. “Why should I claim his name?”

“So be it,” Ms. Grimm said. “We will speak again soon, Miss Quick.” She rose to her feet. “Oh, yes.” She reached into the pocket of her jacket, and withdrew a wand. “This was recovered from Mr. Journey. I imagine you want it back.” She held it out.

Alexandra closed her fingers around the hickory wand. It was reassuring to have it back in her hand. “Thank you.” And as the Dean turned to leave, she said, “Ms. Grimm?”

Grimm turned, with a raised eyebrow.

“I think there are still things you're not telling me.”

The Dean stood there a moment, and then the corners of her mouth twitched.

“My dear child,” she said, with a bemused expression. “There are things I am not telling you that would fill half the library. Good evening, Miss Quick.” And she walked out of the infirmary without another look back, her heels clicking against the floor, while Alexandra ran her fingers along her wand and watched her go.


Okay, that's one of the few edits I'm going to make during this reread: fix that misuse of "bemused."

Ms. Grimm's deflection is skillful, but again, it shows that her biggest mistake throughout the books is probably underestimating (or mis-estimating) her niece.

Comments

( 7 comments — Leave a comment )
kith_koby
Jan. 29th, 2013 11:51 am (UTC)
I have to say that Lilith's final words did not sit well with me. It sounded far too much like Dumbledore, some kind of play-acting as the wise old wizard. It just didn't mesh with what I feel we know of Lilith. She's not some mysterious old wizard figure, like Gandalf or Dumbledore - she's simply an educator, an intensely private person, who keeps her own counsel and does what she thinks is right. I think it would have been a lot more in character if she simply said 'yes'.

I do wonder about that speech of Lilith's to Alexandra. She makes excellent points, and I think that in some way, Alexandra has assimilated it. More and more, Alexandra not only refuses to use people, she refuses to allow people to help her. And maybe this is the primary difference between Abraham and Alexandra - where Abraham uses people (though he regrets it), Alexandra is trying not to use people, and maybe even not to allow people to be used by her.
tealterror0
Jan. 29th, 2013 04:23 pm (UTC)
I see where you're coming from, but I disagree. Academics have senses of humor too. :p Seriously though, I don't mind that Lilith has a semi-playful side, it makes her rounder and more human.

Alex has certainly gotten better as the series has gone on, but she's still having problems in this regard. She does order around her friends, especially Anna, which I still have an issue with. And even her refusing to let people help her is a kind of selfishness--instead of respecting her friends' desire to help her, she doesn't want their injuries/deaths on her conscience. She still has a ways to go in treating her friends as equals, not followers.

(And I'm sorry for not responding to your email yet; I feel like I should do research first and I've been kind of too lazy to do that. DX I promise I will send a response eventually! Hopefully this weekend.)
kith_koby
Jan. 29th, 2013 04:51 pm (UTC)
Maybe she was trying to intentionally imitate Dumbledore! It's ironic!

I agree with the selfishness comment, and the fact that it still means she's treating her friends as followers whom she can command rather than equals who are free to make their own choices... but I can kind of accept that. Maimonides write in his philosophies that if one was too extreme in a trait and wishes to fix it, he should go to the other extreme, and he will eventually balance to the middle path. While I'm not sure how much I agree with it, I think it is a very human trait to overcompensate, and I think that's what Alexandra is doing.

Eh, no worries, I mean, it's all over by now and I'm rather pleased with the results. I did regret not being able to talk over the Australian Open... The Men's was excellent, but I was disappointed by the final stages of the Women's... I was hoping for a Serena/Sharapova final, and for Kimiko Date-Krumm to advance further...
tealterror0
Jan. 30th, 2013 04:21 am (UTC)
New theory: Lilith is a Dumbledore fangirl. It makes sense if you don't think about it.

Well, she is still quite young, and I was an asshole too at that age. She's showing signs of improvement and while I think she'll always be kind of a shitty friend, she'll probably at least have a lot more self-awareness by Book 6 or so.

The Australian Open was really weird this year. Although I will say that I wasn't hoping for Serena/Sharapova, because we all know what would happen and the only drama would be how many games Sharapova would manage to scrape out. Not very exciting. And Date-Krumm did really well, all things considered.
kith_koby
Jan. 30th, 2013 02:00 pm (UTC)
Well, on the Womens' side, yes. I thought it rather par for the course on the Mens'. I know Date-Krumm did really well all things considered, I just wanted her to do even more. And that was exactly the point! Sharapova had set a new record, she was in top form! When Li Na whipped her, I was in shock! I had hoped she'd actually present a challenge to Serena for once.
lunacorva
Jan. 29th, 2013 04:10 pm (UTC)
Okay, those dialog tags are awful. Anna "squeaks," and you can't smirk dialog.

Personally I actually use that kind of thing a lot in my own writing. Even if you can't technically "smirk" dialogue, saying:"Angelique smirked." is much more efficient than saying "Angelique said with a smirk on her face." Sure it's not one hundred percent acurrate, but I think most people would get the picture.

Now as for the "Circle Of Attracting 'Magic Rules Lawyers' On The Forums Who Still Claim The Spell Could Not Exist Simply Because There Has Been No Precedence Even Though There Are Obviously Going To Be Spell And Spell Uses That J.K Rowling Never Mentioned", I GROSSLY missunderstood the limits of the spell. When I was thinking of a way for a potential villain to go about killing Alex, I thought that the spell would swap the killers place for Alex's regardless of who they were or what they did. So even if you hired a guy to drop a piano on her head, the spell would STILL teleport her out of harms way and teleport you under the falling piano in her stead.

Moving on...


“With his death, the Circle is broken, I think, at least as far as your protection goes. No one else is likely to die in your place, Alexandra.”

Oh yeah, way to send your alreday psychologically damaged neice on a guilt trip you moron! (And before anyone gets up in arms, that comment was directed at Lillith the character, not Inverarity the writer.)

“You are, I think, more like your father than you know. No, listen to me, child!” she added, as Alexandra was about to interrupt her. “What we know about Abraham Thorn is that he is egotistical, arrogant, willing to protect those close to him, but also willing to use them."

Okay seriously Lillith. I get what you're trying to say here, but the way it comes out, it sounds like your telling Alex she's a horrible friend and only ever uses them. Tact? What's that?

And okay yes, many people would consider the above to be a perfect description of Alexandra, but I disagree. One of the reasons I like Alex so much, is that she and I have a great deal in common. One of those elements is that we can be quite lazer focused. Now I (and I believe Alex as well.) certainly care about our friends and want the best for them, but we tend to become so focused on our goals that we forget to take a few "extra variables" into account. I know it's ruthless but it's just the way we think. Though I probably have it worse, since most of my thought process seems to be entirely composed of Insane Troll Logic.

...I suddenly realised that saying WE in that previous sentence was rather arrogant and pretentious (But then again I AM arrogant and pretentious, BASK IN MY NAKED GLORY!!!). Just to be clear, I was reffering to my own interpretation of Alex, I did not mean to imply that I have some great personal understanding of her (I DO mean to imply that I'm a genius however :D)

Anyway, back to Lillith. I certainly agree with her having a "people problem." (in fact I'm starting to think that Lillith might have her own Alexandraesque psychological issues with trust) and a lot of her rather tactless remarks made we want to Dope Slap her this chapter (That's Dope Slap, not Bitchslap. despite what I've said in this post I actually quite admire Lillith. I think she's quite trustworthy and intelligent when she's not being pants-on-head retarded.)

Edited at 2013-01-29 04:13 pm (UTC)
inverarity
Jan. 30th, 2013 01:36 am (UTC)
Personally I actually use that kind of thing a lot in my own writing. Even if you can't technically "smirk" dialogue, saying:"Angelique smirked." is much more efficient than saying "Angelique said with a smirk on her face." Sure it's not one hundred percent acurrate, but I think most people would get the picture.


It's very common, but trust me, it's bad writing. Insta-reject from almost any professional publisher.

When I was thinking of a way for a potential villain to go about killing Alex, I thought that the spell would swap the killers place for Alex's regardless of who they were or what they did. So even if you hired a guy to drop a piano on her head, the spell would STILL teleport her out of harms way and teleport you under the falling piano in her stead.


This is what Journey thought. In fact, it would be a member of the Thorn Circle who would be killed by the piano. When Journey tried to shoot her, a member of the Thorn Circle took the bullet. Which happened to be... him. Whether because he was the would-be murderer, or because he was closest, or because he had betrayed the Circle, I have chosen not to elaborate...
( 7 comments — Leave a comment )

My Book Reviews

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner